NHL Rumor Mill – December 3, 2018

by | Dec 3, 2018 | Rumors | 72 comments

Latest on the Leafs, Bruins, and Wild in your NHL rumor mill.

CAN LEAFS AFFORD TO RE-SIGN GARDINER?

SPORTSNET: Mike Johnston reports William Nylander’s new six-year, $41.77-million contract could affect the Toronto Maple Leafs’ efforts to re-sign Jake Gardiner. The 28-year-old defenseman is due to become an unrestricted free agent next July and is earning an annual average value of $4.05 million on his current deal. The Leafs must also re-sign star forwards Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner, who become restricted free agents next summer and will be due to receive significant raises.

Can the Toronto Maple Leafs afford to re-sign Jake Gardiner? (Photo via NHL Images)

Johnston cites colleague Nick Kypreos could command between $6 million to $7 million per season on the open market next summer, though that might not be feasible for the Leafs, who have over $56 million invested in 12 players for 2019-20. Kypreos believes if Gardiner is willing to accept a slight increase over his current cap hit the Leafs would be more than willing to sign him to a long-term deal. Elliotte Friedman suggests using signing bonuses as a way of getting Gardiner to accept less than what he’d get via free agency.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: It could cost around $22 million for the Leafs to get Matthews and Marner under contract, pushing the Leafs’ cap hit to around $78 million committed to 14 players. Even if Gardiner agrees to a slight pay bump, the Leafs won’t have much room to re-sign him and still have enough room to fill out the rest of their roster. They’ll have to shed some salary to free up sufficient cap space or watch Gardiner depart via free agency. 

RECENT BRUINS SPECULATION

NBC SPORTS BOSTON: In a recent mailbag segment, Joe Haggerty addressed trade suggestions and questions from his readers. Asked about the possibility of adding a power forward, Haggerty suggested Philadelphia Flyers winger Wayne Simmonds could be a good short-term option if he’s available by the trade deadline.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: if the Flyers don’t gain ground soon in the Eastern Conference standings, their new general manager (whoever that might be) could try to trade him before the Feb. 25, 2019 deadline. Despite Simmonds’ struggles this season, he could still attract plenty of interest from playoff contenders (like the Bruins) in need of a two-way physical presence on their forward lines. 

To add some secondary scoring, Haggerty suggests dealing from some of their surplus young wingers. He in favor of moving Anders Bjork as he’s not sure Bjork fits into the Bruins’ big picture. They might also have to part with Ryan Donato or Danton Heinen.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: Those three have frequently surfaced in the trade-rumor mill of late. One of them could be playing elsewhere by the trade deadline. 

Regarding the possibility of trading defenseman Torey Krug, Haggerty feels there’s more upside to keeping Krug than in trading him. The only reason to move him would be if there’s significant value for him in the trade market. Haggerty also shoots down the idea of dealing for St. Louis Blues winger Vladimir Taransenko, citing the high cost to land him.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: The Bruins aren’t landing Tarasenko and I don’t see the Blues making such an extreme move this season. If they decide to shop Taranseko, it’ll happen in the offseason, perhaps during the 2019 NHL Draft.

As for Krug, he was frequently mentioned in last summer’s trade chatter but that talk has since died away. Seems the Bruins value his puck-moving abilities and offensive contributions. 

LATEST WILD RUMORS

THE ATHLETIC: During a recent mailbag segment, Michael Russo was asked about recent speculation claiming the Boston Bruins could be interested in Minnesota Wild forward Charlie Coyle. He believes Coyle might benefit from a fresh start and playing in his hometown. He mentioned Bruins forward Ryan Donato as an intriguing possibility for the Wild. 

SPECTOR’S NOTE: Russo’s colleague Joe McDonald recently reported the Bruins could revisit their offseason interest in Coyle, suggesting it could take packaging one of their young forwards with a draft pick to acquire him. Since then, however, there’s been nothing really new about this speculation. Could be worth watching as Wild GM Paul Fenton continues to evaluate his roster. 

Asked if the Wild should pursue Edmonton Oilers winger Jesse Puljujarvi, Russo feels it depends on the asking price. He’d also like to see how Puljujarvi performs under new Oilers coach Ken Hitchcock. 

SPECTOR’S NOTE: It’s believed the Oilers remain reluctant to part with Puljujarvi as they fear he’ll blossom elsewhere. Baring a significant offer, they’re unlikely to move him this season. 

 







72 Comments

  1. OK, so we’ve finally come to the end of the Nylander drama – at least for the rest of this season – so now it’s gonna be replaced by endless speculation on Gardiner?

    Reply
    • Haha Goerge O, you know it…but at least we know he isn’t getting dealt during the season..
      I don’t share everyone’s fear on the leafs cap situation..
      They cant afford Gardiner at 6 or 7- but at 5- its do able(even with Marner and Matthews at 12 and 9). Im just not sure they should, they are better off letting him go and having Dermott replace him. 2 years from now Sandin and Lilegren are both playing…If they can find a way to move Zaitsev now -that would be ideal, and then they could focus money on Gardiner, if they chose.
      They will move Connor Brown and get Johnsson and kapanen on 1 or 2 year extensions- just to get them through Marleau’s last year. Its all good, and maybe Matthews and Marner take less-… you never know

      is there a team out there that would take Zaitsev and Connor Brown with a pick- for an expiring D contract?

      Reply
    • oh gawd, I hope not ! By the by, anyone know what the cap implications are for the Leafs if Marleau retires at the end of the season ? I am sure being an O/35 player there are definitely some cap implications.

      Reply
      • If Marleau retires being a 35+ contract the cap hit stays unless they trade the contract to some team trying to reach the cap floor. Marleau retires a Shark is what I hope for, probably won`t happen,

    • Oh No! Talk about the Leafs. It’s a cruel burden.

      Reply
    • George O, did you see the headline on Tsn “Nylander has Landed” I guess next headline will be “Nylander takes first dump in Toronto since signing new contract”

      Reply
      • Caper

        They will have to go back to the factory and re-size WW’s bobble head— it will have to be made twice as large

    • Just a quick hit here…

      I dont think the Leafs can give Jake Gardiner ..Morgan Riellys money…2 years removed..just can happen….he will not be signed…Dermot or Sandin will replace him …..lots to say ..but not sure its worth it….
      Cheers

      Reply
    • George O so true that s leaf fans for you even when they were a mediocre team they were front and center lol

      Reply
  2. Who cares if a player blossoms somewhere else if he is dying on the vine on your team.

    St. Louis might end up last as the Kings are playing better. Not improving their record just yet but that will come.

    Gardiner would have to start at the 5.5 range for a new salary. And would get that and more on the open market

    A new Calcutta on Nylander. How long before a grown injury ?

    Reply
  3. George: the transfer from Nylander to Gardiner is a conspiracy to drive you batty ….soon you will need another sabbatical from this site….meanwhile excessive numbers of Leaf fans need (like crack cocaine addicts) need their daily dose

    In that vein…what do you think they will do with Connor Brown as a 2 million 4 th liner….that should be good for the week after the Gardiner obsession

    Meanwhile the media gets their hits and the fans of other teams think it is the responsibility of Leaf fans….who are just like fans of other teams….obsessed with their own team

    Thus it goes…it is tribal not logical..it is so Canadian..hope you don’t take your second sabbatical….I like reading your stuff

    Reply
    • Nah – was just joking Old Blue Dog … well, sorta – and those columnists have to fill their daily( weekly?) quota and if there’s nothing to write about they speculate. We get it here from “rumor du jour” Garrioch, Don (always Looking For Controversy) Brennan, and Wayne (Can’t Get Free Flights Anymore) Scanlan.

      Reply
  4. Was out of town all yesterday. Just read the posts for yesterday and today re: WW and contract.

    Prudent points on all sides. Some heated banter, but all good. I’m in the very small minority that feels this was a serious capitulation by GMKD. I personally would have let him sit and get the best trade possible for him at TDL (less likely) or off-season (25 + teams with offers).

    At first glance it’s a crippling contract and 19/20 will be a much weaker Leaf team than 18/19 due to this signing (cap casualties). Closer look and perhaps GMKD has structured the deal with an out that works— I’m hoping the structure of the contract was truly with this “out” in mind— see below).

    Currently for 19/20 (with expected Cap at $84M); and setting aside the Horton contract— Leafs will have less than $34M left to sign 12 players ($2.8 per) including MM and AM.

    I will make an easy prediction (brain dead complete logic) here and now— Leafs cannot have same key players in 19/20 as at now. Will lose at LEAST one key player— why:

    If there is a miraculous set of signings and pigs do fly and 4 separate agents have complete meltdowns and GMKD gets AM, MM, Gardner, and Kappy for $28M (read — complete fantasy)…. The team has to sign the balance of team …. 7 players (including 3 D and a back-up) EACH for league minimum.

    More than likely MM and AM are going to cost $22M AT LEAST between them—- leaving <$12M for 10 players and with only Reilly, Zaitz, Holl on D at that time; and no back-up

    Now the deeper look at the WW contract…. As of July 1st he will already be paid $17M+ ($8.3M SB on 1/7/19). Balance of contract— 5 years left — cap each year of $7M but cash per year only Avg of $4.94M. That <$5M per contract should be very valuable to a team that has the space.

    Marleau— after July 1 SB paid — only owed $1.25M cash… Cap hit next year $6.25M
    So— easy solution — trade PM— receiving team (cash poor, cap rich team) will likely ask for 3rd rounder— even if 2nd — take it— worth it

    Trade WW (after 1/7/19) — Top 4 D, top 9 winger…. Maybe more (depends on balance of year performance)

    WW and PM out— 13.25M Cap freed up…. Incoming Top 4 D and top 9 winger— $8 Max… freed up $5.25M in Cap… it can be done…

    … but can ONLY be done with either/both WW or PM traded OR they will not be able to sign all of AM, MM, Kappy, Gardner— so team will be losing at least one key player from this year’s roster.

    Did WW signing currently make team better— yep. Did it secure a cup in ’19— I’m still very skeptical (barring D upgrade) that they can plough through 3 Eastern teams and one Western team, this year, with this D as is. Anything can happen; and better chance than last week. However, I’m just much more on the hesitant/skeptical side to think they can do it this year.

    With a trade of WW and PM on/after July 2nd ; and securing a D upgrade and freeing up cap space for other moves; Leafs would then truly be in the hunt for multiple cups ’20 through ’26 IMO.

    So— If this logic/scenario was the intent of GMKD when he signed the MM contract; then I take back my consternation and bitterness of the perceived “capitulation” and idiocy of the contract (at first glance).

    Fingers crossed

    GLG

    Reply
      • shoreorrpark

        Yes please and thank-you

        🙂

    • Pengy: Marleau has a NMC, so he only gets traded with his blessing. If Kapanen is going to want anything around $5M/year as suggested on this site, I would trade him before Nylander. I also agree with a poster above that Connor Brown is a likely cap casualty as he is a fourth liner on this team and isn’t worth $2M/year to the Leafs. He should be easy to trade at that price and previous production.

      Zaitsev will be difficult to trade and the Leafs would definitely have to add a significant sweetener there to get that done. Horton’s contract will be next to impossible to trade given it is uninsured (i.e. no point in cap floor teams in getting that contract). Can’t remember who brought it up, but I can definitely see Matthews and/or Marner signing right after the season begins so Toronto can put Horton on LTIR first.

      Reply
      • Hi Van

        Yep knew about NMC for PM…. was hoping (praying) that he would somehow be nice enough to allow to be traded …. even if back to SJ at %50 so that he can retire a Shark would free up $3.13M in Cap; cost $625K (both teams)— what is the additional to give to SJ to make that happen?

        I know he’s fit and a great team player; great person— however, what is the true incentive to put your body through a grueling year at 40 and only get $1.25M?? The only hurt to Leafs is Cap hit of $6.25M. I still wish GMLL would have given him the $17.50 M for two years (which he did) but have the contract end there (2 years)– no problem Cap wise in 18/19. They could have then re-signed him for $3 M for 1 year in 19/20; he’d get more $’s and Leafs save $3.25M in Cap space in 19/20. That would have been a win-win-win contract. Hopefully something happens

        No matter what — they should trade WW on/after 2/7/19— they have enough scoring without him. Trade saves Cap and allows a Top 4 D upgrade w/o any tax/deficit to scoring needed. There should be at least 15 teams willing to pay only $4.94M per for 5 years; with a Cap hit of $7M.

        Gardner AND/OR WW gone … can’t have both

        Kappy even at $4M (if they keep WW and PM) will be a Cap casualty.

        I’d rather trade WW; somehow trade PM; and keep Kappy. That’s me though.

        I’m looking forward to July 2nd big time
        🙂

      • No way they trade Marleau they have too much respect for him and would send a message to any aging vet they might want to add in future.Kapanen should stay with Kadri and Johnnson. If either continue to get second line minutes they will rack up the points and become unaffordable. I agree Brown should go as he now effectively becomes a 4th line player. His value is highest right now and Ennis can take that 4th line spot. Sadly, I think Leivo will get the boot. The only guy outside of Kadri with some grit.

  5. This just in John the hot dog guy in Scotiabank arena is looking for a raise, what’s Dubas gonna do?!?

    Reply
    • Buy him a sling-shot so he doesn’t have to walk up and down the steps to deliver them

      Reply
      • People thought Nylander got old? wait for it weekly discussions of the Leafs financial situation for about the next 3 years.the way I think the Leafs will likely look at this thing is by signing a contract or 2 at the beginning of the season after Horton comes off the books shorter terms and high turn over similar to the way JR teams operate as this team was built by a couple of guys who have a pretty good understanding of when to cut bait judging by the way their previous careers were spent. I know Hunter is no longer with the team but the Greyhounds and Knights have not been pretty successful in turning things over and staying relevant in a league where there may not be a cap to worry about but other obstacles prevent the team for remaining together for any length of time and they have a pretty good history of remaining competitive. If you can’t afford a 5 mill player you can likely replace him with a younger part such as Dermott,and use the asset to restock the cupboards somewhere else until that position is at a point of cutting someone loose. This is gonna get annoying to all I’m sure. Another sure thing is that the Leafs AGM has a better idea than most on how to manipulate the cap judging by the last few years

      • Pay guys up front heavily weighted in “bonus” cash giving them 40-50% of their whole contract in the first year or 2 lower their escrow and I wouldn’t be surprised if Matthews or Marner come in less money and term than what’s being “floated” around

  6. re: Leafs cap next year,11 players signed, the roster needs to be @ 23. They have 24 million to spend, AM & MM will likely cost ~19-20 leaving 4-5 to sign 10 players. Someone will be moved, best case is Zaitsev + sweeteners, else it will be Kadri. I can’t see how they fit Gardiner in.

    Reply
  7. The Bruins are way too soft right now. Chara out for an extended period exacerbates that problem. Backes is a big guy, will drop the gloves but he doesn’t instill fear in anyone. Krejci has been rocked in back to back games and aside from some token bravery by Marchand, Cave etc, nobody has help the opponent accountable. I agree they need a third line center and a second line right shot RW but someone who can and will fight when need be would be a HUGE asset too. Maybe you get both with the addition of a RW for Krecji’s line but Charlie Coyle isn’t that guy. Don’t see him as available now, but Josh Anderson would be.

    Reply
    • Never thought about Anderson.
      Big body, plays a heavy game with a bit of bark to boot.
      Pretty good hands as well.
      How does the Bruins acquire both him and Calvert though?

      Reply
    • Hey Taz, this has been my handle here for quite sometime.
      Requesting here that you possibly choose something different? Appreciate it kind Sir!

      Reply
      • No worries, I defer to your tenure.

      • A gentleman of the highest order!

      • That was … well … nifty

      • Bravo gentlemen

  8. I hope Leafs lose in first round and some team offer sheets Matthews or Marner for league max.

    Reply
      • I actually think Arizona will offer sheet Mathews.
        I heard an interview with Chayka and he did not deny the opportunity, he said if it would make the team better it would not surprise him if there was an offer sheet

    • Matt hope all you want it will never happen. As for fitting players under the cap in the next few years, I don’t think it will be as bad as (us) experts are claiming. I mentioned weeks ago how they might possibly wait to the last minute so they can pay him $10m in year one and something around $6.5+ in the remaining years.
      I don’t know yet what their plan is for next year and honestly couldn’t care one bit because first, this is a great team and with Nylander it’s even better and secondly, one of the team’s AGMs helped write the current CBA so I think it’s safe to say if there’s a loop hole or a way to make someone fit under the cap it would be him that would know, don’t you think? You can belly ache all you want on how this guy or that guy is gonna get paid and maybe your right but I’ll trust a pro vs a talking head or people’s opinions which are based on bias. Lastly, I think we can all agree you spend on talent, put most of you cap going to you top players and have your support players on the cheap, ie pay your lower pairings and forwards on either ELC or under $3-4m if that…I’m thinking someone like Kappy or whoever is only going to get a small pay increase and short term, like Brown’s.

      Reply
      • 1 he would have to sign the offer sheet and I’m not sure but I think as much as playing in front of dozens home town fans in Arizona maybe tempting it may lose something in Texas or Oklahoma and where is all this money coming from with a struggling franchise? You think they up a bunch of bonus cash say 40 mill up front in the the first few years? Maybe but if your already losing money and this doesn’t help like right away could be a big pill to swallow or just lighting even more money on fire and do you honestly think he has a better shot at a championship in Toronto or in the suburbs of Arizona think star players want to play for a relocated franchise and gonna sign their life away to play in Texas or OKC when the only reason to possibly consider it would be to play at home in Arizona? I’m not so sure and I’m not so sure it would be the end of the world if he did so wouldn’t be getting worked up about offersheets.

    • If Arizona doesn’t offer sheet Mathews at the league max, they don’t deserve to be in the NHL!!!

      Reply
      • That is one of the craziest things I’ve ever seen here, and that says a lot!

        So a struggling franchise should bury themselves yet even further by offering a max contract / offer sheet … and if they don’t… they don’t belong in the nhl? Clear as mud…

      • From a struggling franchise? Ya, that sounds like a wise move.

      • Good point, BruinsFan, they don’t. And neither do several other franchises. Let’s start a retraction campaign – I nominate Arizona, Florida and Carolina to start. The floor is open to further suggestions.

      • A good point is throw an offer sheet at Mathews or you don’t deserve a franchise? Just so we’re clear? Lmfao!

        The plot thickens ! I have to hear this….

      • This conversation almost makes the “Doughty for our 4th line scrub, a 2nd and a career Ahl’er, la holds 50%” seem like a more tolerant post.

        Where are we relocating Florida, Arizona, and Carolina again?

        Florida, I agree … wholeheartedly…. wrong demographic. It won’t work…

        But where are we sending these 3 teams, today?

      • Personally I think Kansas City could be an idea but I could see Houston or OKC working hate to say it but I think there are a few destinations I could see being way better options as far as arena market etc and that’s before I could see the return to Quebec which most Canadian fans would love to see

      • See I’ll play nice NYR we can get along I’ll try not to be too overblown if you do too these were the great conversation s we used to have before we started screaming at one another unfortunately it comes on a Leaf day and well…on with the gong show

    • Matt, Shoreorrpark, Ron,

      I can all but guarantee that if Leafs do not have AM signature on a contract by 1/7/19— there will be an offer sheet.

      Offer sheets are very very rare— this will make the exception. You can count on Arz already willing to pay big. They are suffering huge at box office (and as TSN hinted)– there are some rumblings re: Arz to Houston. AM as a Coyote will increase sales revs greater than the premium they would pay in an offer sheet. They are loaded in young depth… 4 first rounders worth it.

      What AMs agent and GMKD can work on pre July is still TBD.

      When it all boils down to it; this is a business and AMs agent must think in those terms.

      It would not be a stretch for him to tell AM to wait it out past Jul 1— just to see what the offer sheet is. (1) he can wave that offer in Leafs face and push for a match (if it is $14M as some media (SN/TSN) has pondered) — how can Leafs match that?

      If Arz offered $100M over 7 years to play in his home town— this has to give him pause to consider it.

      Putting supposition aside— GMKD , IMO, must hammer this out prior to Jul 1st.

      The AM contract signing is a must pre July, and almost a must for MM (offer-sheet is a possibility, but IMO, the possibility is less than what I believe to be a “DEFINITE” for AM).

      GMKD, sharpen your pencil.

      I can’t realistically fathom anyway AM/MM total comes in at less than $21M— if so, their agents collectively have been had.

      Even with that miracle; barring trade— leaves <$13M to sign 10 players and at that point (again barring a trade); Leafs only have on D: Reilly, Zaitz, Holl signed.

      Interesting times

      Reply
      • Interesting times. Isn’t that part of a Chinese curse? “May you live in interesting times”

      • Who’s making out the checks for the rest of the 100 mill in year 5-8 of the deal and should he start house shopping on 2 cities cause the Yotes ate not in Arizona goruch longer now that Gary and the owners see franchise fees going for.

      • Contraction, NY4Life, contraction – the league needs fewer teams, not more. Don’t move them, delete them. Fewer teams, higher quality.

    • Offer sheets are rare, very rare. But players like Mathews don’t come around that often. I’d O/S him in a heartbeat.

      Reply
      • Even more rare is an offer sheet working. 8 offer sheets in the cap era, successfully once. Well “successfully “ may be a strong word. It was Dustin Penner. Let’s say it “worked” once.

        Stamkos may be the best player in the cap era that could have seen an offer sheet, but didn’t . I don’t see anyone throwing an offer at Mathews. And if they did, Toronto would more than likely match.

    • I have to wonder about people that come here just to show their disdain for other teams?

      Especially when they can’t even give players or franchises any type of credit at all. This is truly wearing blinders! And quite frankly a bit “yahoo-ish”

      “Rangers suck”….

      Well thanks for that well thought out contribution!

      Reply
    • It will happen! They would match and have to rotate 15 players between forward and defence.

      Be just like the good old pee wee days!

      Reply
      • You mean like the Oilers used to do with Gretzky and Coffey and hope to hell Fuhr could stop most of the breakaways they gave up

  9. Can they afford Gardner??? More like can they afford Matthews or Marner.

    I understand it’s dlow this time of year in the trade rumours but who cares about Gardner or the Maple Losers.

    When they choke again in round 1, and traded all their draft picks and prospects for rentals will be back to the Shannaplan.

    Reply
    • “slurp slurp maple losers! slurp slurp”

      Good input right there feel better twin?

      Reply
    • I thought we had finally gotten rid of the juveniles who trot out crap like “the Maple Losers” “Laffs” and “Senaturds” which are more properly suited for the school playgrounds. Take it somewhere else if you can’t discuss things without that buls”^t.

      Reply
  10. Josh Leivo traded to the Canucks for Carcone

    Reply
    • Levio has a chance to play on a regular basis. Now let’s see if he can score more points then than that slug in Edmonton “Lucic”? I will place my money on levio.

      Reply
  11. Go Edmonton Firstrounders Go!

    Reply
    • I wonder if they have a signed ping pong ball section in their hall of fame?

      Reply
  12. These discussions are always dominated by Leaf fans … and it gets really really really really old.

    Reply
    • Amen.

      Reply
      • We should make a leafs only blog we’re all these Oilers haters can talk about how great their 50 year drout is.

        It could be a make believe fantasy land, but still in moms basement where the leafs are the only team in the NHL and haute tees a Stanley cup parade without having to win on the Xbox.

        All hail leafs fans and pink fluffy buddies!

    • Because there’s a lot more of them. Hell, here in Ottawa half the bloody arena is occupied by Leafs fans when they come to town – and Montreal fans when the Habs are in town. Old loyalties die hard.

      Reply
    • It shows leaf fans are everywhere and are passionate for their leafs.

      Reply
  13. Sprong to Ducks for Pettersson. I watched the Ducks score 5 unanswered yesterday to come back and beat the Caps in Washington. Could be the turning point in the season for Anaheim.

    Reply
    • Or maybe a turning point in the other direction for the Capitals?

      Reply
      • George, Caps had won 7 in a row prior to yesterday, Holtby struggled in nets, they will be ok. Ducks on the other hand have underachieved and battled injuries for most of the year. Coming back from being down 5-1 against the cup champs in their barn is a huge win. Looks like the Oilers gave up on Aberg a bit prematurely.

    • Pengy is going to have a heart attack now that Sprong has been traded. Don’t know much about Pettersson, but his numbers indicate he is more of a defensive defenseman. Has anyone seen Pettersson play and, if so, what is his upside? Sprong could end up being a solid top 6 scoring forward if given a chance.

      Reply
      • I can’t see Sprong cracking top 6 in Anaheim this year, when healthy they are pretty solid up front. I can see him playing with Kesler and Silfverberg on the 3rd unit

  14. Bruins have a bunch of injuries right now. Trading away the future for a quick fix is a bad idea. Play what we have and deal with it. Team will be stronger when Bergeron,Miller and Mcavoy return. Chara should retire after this season his 5 million cap could go toward a top 6 forward.

    Reply
    • Still playing over 21 minutes a night Dave. Will see how he recovers from this injury, but another year of seasoning with Z around can’t hurt the young guys.
      Perhaps a lower cap hit, but a very good defender playing 20 plus minutes should still get paid.

      Reply
  15. we should increase draft choice to seven or eight that we could maybe land for minor trade player.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.