NHL Rumor Mill – January 21, 2026

by | Jan 21, 2026 | Rumors | 9 comments

Check out the latest on the Canucks, Flames, Rangers, and Kraken in today’s NHL Rumor Mill.

WHAT’S NEXT FOR THE CANUCKS AFTER THE SHERWOOD TRADE?

SPORTSNET: According to The Athletic’s Chris Johnston, there could be teams still intrigued by the skillset of Vancouver Canucks center Elias Pettersson. Despite the decline in the 27-year-old’s production, some clubs could be wondering if he could regain the heights of his career-best 102-point performance in 2022-23.

Johnston noted that the Carolina Hurricanes were interested in Pettersson before he signed his current contract. He thinks they could still be a fit for the struggling Canucks center, especially as they’re willing to trade center Jesperi Kotkaniemi, who could also benefit from a reset.

Vancouver Canucks center Elias Pettersson (NHL Images).

NHL insider Frank Seravalli claimed some teams believe Pettersson could be traded this season, perhaps before the upcoming Olympic break from Feb. 4 to 22. He said the Canucks are in a spot where they’re willing to consider anything and everything.

Pettersson is in the second season of an eight-year contract with an average annual value of $11.6 million. However, if a club believes a change of scenery could rejuvenate his career, Seravalli suggested that Pettersson’s expensive cap hit doesn’t sound like a crazy risk profile.

THE ATHLETIC: Canucks beat writer Thomas Drance acknowledged that Canucks management is willing to entertain offers for their players.

However, he believes those in their late-twenties with term remaining on their contracts aren’t being aggressively shopped. That includes Pettersson, Brock Boeser, Conor Garland, Jake DeBrusk, and Marcus Pettersson.

Regarding Elias Pettersson, Drance believes a center would have to be part of the return to tempt the Canucks into trading him. He also stated that their level of interest in moving defenseman Filip Hronek is “virtually nil.”

Drance also stated that the Canucks aren’t using their draft picks as trade bait, particularly the four picks they hold in the first two rounds of this year’s draft.

Players that don’t factor into the Canucks plans beyond the March 6 trade deadline (Teddy Blueger, David Kampf, and Evander Kane) are the most likely to be moved.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: The Canucks are likely reluctant to retain part of Pettersson’s cap hit to facilitate a trade because six years is a long time to have that dead cap space on their books. That consideration would require a significant offer from a rival club to convince them to do it.

The Hurricanes have the cap space to take on Pettersson’s full cap hit, but his declining production since 2023 would still make him an expensive gamble that could adversely affect their long-term cap room if he doesn’t improve, even if the Canucks would accept Kotkaniemi and his $4.82 million AAV in return.

THE LATEST FLAMES SPECULATION

TSN: Darren Dreger reports there are ongoing discussions between Calgary Flames general manager Craig Conroy and the representatives for center Nazem Kadri. That doesn’t mean a trade is imminent, but Kadri wants to do what’s best for the Flames.

Kadri also wants to win the Stanley Cup. Dreger believes there has been some “tire-kicking” by the Toronto Maple Leafs, Montreal Canadiens, Colorado Avalanche, Los Angeles Kings, and maybe the Dallas Stars.

Dreger stressed that there is no rush on the Flames’ part, and a lot of work to do if they were to trade Kadri.

Meanwhile, Pierre LeBrun reports Conroy didn’t say Kadri and winger Blake Coleman definitely aren’t moving, but he’s open to taking calls about them. LeBrun noted there is a market for Coleman, but the Flames are quite ready to retain the versatile winger given his leadership role with the club.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: It’s understandable why there is so much interest in Kadri. There’s a need for centers in the trade market, and he’s a proven performer. However, he’s also 35 and carries an average annual value of $7 million through 2028-29 with a 13-team no-trade list. Those factors must be taken into consideration, especially for clubs with limited cap space for this season.

Coleman is reportedly drawing the most interest. He has more Stanley Cup experience than Kadri, carries a more affordable cap hit ($4.9 million), and is a versatile two-way forward. It wouldn’t be surprising if he gets moved instead of Kadri before the March 6 trade deadline. However, he’s signed through next season, so the Flames can be patient and wait for a good offer.

J.T. MILLER WON’T BE TRADED BY THE RANGERS

TSN: Pierre LeBrun doesn’t know why J.T. Miller is being mentioned as a trade candidate. He said the New York Rangers captain has no intention of waiving his no-movement clause, and management isn’t going to ask him to do so.

LeBrun pointed out that the Rangers acquired Miller last season and made him captain before this season. They still believe in the reasons why they brought him in.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: Miller’s teammate, Mika Zibanejad, also reportedly doesn’t intend to waive his no-movement clause. Of the three Rangers’ forwards with NMCs, Artemi Panarin is the only one that management could move if he’s willing to waive his clause.

KRAKEN RUMORED TO BE SHOPPING JAMIE OLEKSIAK

EDMONTON JOURNAL: David Staples cited a report by NHL insider Frank Seravalli, claiming the Seattle Kraken are looking to move defenseman Jamie Oleksiak by the March 6 trade deadline.

The Kraken are jockeying for a wildcard berth in the Western Conference. Nevertheless, Seravalli said they’re in the same market in terms of trading veterans such as Oleksiak, Jaden Schwartz, and Jordan Eberle. Staples thinks Oleksiak could be a good rental addition to the Oilers’ blueline.

SPECTOR’S NOTE: Oleksiak, Schwartz, and Eberle are original members of the Kraken, but they’re also UFA-eligible this summer. Management is transitioning the roster toward younger talent, which explains why they may be willing to part with those players at the deadline for draft picks despite the risk of scuttling their chances for a playoff spot.







9 Comments

  1. Zibanejad is going nowhere.

    Panarin is gone.

    Not sure why I keep seeing this crazy idea that neither are worth anything.

    Over the last 5 year’s Zibanejad ranks 8th among centers in scoring. 26th overall among ALL nhl players the last 5 years

    Panarin is ranked #1 among left wingers in that same time span. 6th among ALL players in the NHL over 5 years.

    You’re not getting Panarin for a 5th and a b prospect. He’s undoubtedly #1 on the board.

    The other options ? Coleman, Mangiapane, Hamilton?

    You’d be hard pressed to find a player not getting a 1st ++ at the deadline averaging more than a point a game. UFA or not. Panarin will be no different. Regardless of the NY jersey.

    Reply
    • The return won’t be as high as it should be as he will probably say I will go here and only here. Whether it is Avs. Or panthers etc. that make the return smaller

      Reply
    • Panarin is different in that he can just say “no” to a trade to any team he wants and just wait until he’s a ufa. NY isn’t getting a King’s ransom for a player that has all the control.

      Reply
  2. If CAR has cap space why doesn’t Van send the Pettersson then
    Just has for a haul and take KK of their hands to get more from CAR

    Kk is not that expensive in the big picture
    kK can play 2/3c and with a rising cap Van will have space again to play with in addition to the prospect and picks they’d obtain from sending Elias to CAR

    Am I thinking too illogical?

    Reply
  3. Heh. If trade history is any indication, and if Kadri is indeed dealt, it likely won’t involve any among the speculated destinations of Toronto, Montreal, Colorado, Los Angeles or Dallas, but rather a team no one gave even a remote thought to as “likely.”

    Reply
    • Islanders?

      Fits the Flyer mold too

      Reply
    • George O: I wonder if Craig Conroy would be willing to (Assuming Kadri says yes) ship Kadri to Carolina for Kotkaniemi, Bradley Nadeau, Car’s 1st 26 and a conditional 1st in 28.

      Reply
      • That would be a huge overpay

      • While I’m sure Tulsky would do that in a flash if he feels his club is close to winning it all, since landing a C like Kadri – who’s been a remarkably consistent offensive player throughout his career – could certainly be the icing on a pretty good cake.

        Not to mention infinitely better than Kotkeniami, who’s been pretty much a total bust since being drafted 3rd overall 8 years ago. Nor is the undrafted Nadeau anything more than a toss-in.

        The 1st round picks figure to be near the bottom of this year’s draft, and only maybe a bit higher in 2028.

        As for Conroy, that’s an under-whelming return, IF Kadri is prepared to go to a contender, I’m sure he could get better offers from the likes of Tampa, Vegas, Dallas and maybe even Florida and Minnesota.

        The one over-riding caveat is that Kadri costs $7 mil per off the cap for 3 more seasons after this, by which time he’ll be turning 38 y/o for that final season.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *