NHL Rumor Mill – June 18, 2026
The latest on Jets goalie Connor Hellebuyck, Panthers netminder Sergei Bobrovsky, Ducks center Mason McTavish, Maple Leaf winger Matthew Knies, Canucks winger Brock Boeser, and many more in today’s NHL Rumor Mill.
IS JETS GOALTENDER CONNOR HELLEBUYCK AVAILABLE?
TSN: Darren Dreger is the latest to claim there is “noise in Winnipeg” regarding Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck.
Dreger believes teams are calling the Jets about Hellebuyck because the goaltender shared his disappointment about their performance this season. He believes Jets general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff “is at least in a position where he knows he has to listen.”

Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck (NHL Images).
According to Dreger, the Jets need centers for their second and fourth lines, and they’d also like to look at their blueline. If they trade Hellebuyck, they’ll need a replacement for him as well.
The Jets struggle to make big trades because it’s hard to lure players with no-trade protection to Winnipeg. But if the three-time Vezina Trophy-winning Hellebuyck is in play, who has a no-movement clause, and teams are calling, Dreger believes Cheveldayoff “is at least willing at this point to consider that.”
SPORTSNET: Nick Kypreos also reports there is “lots of noise” growing around the league that Hellebuyck wants a change of scenery. However, he acknowledged that, if the goaltender has requested a trade, both sides have done a tremendous job keeping it quiet.
If Hellebuyck has asked to be traded, Kypreos suggested the Detroit Red Wings, Buffalo Sabres, and the Florida Panthers as possible landing spots.
WINNIPEG FREE PRESS: Ken Wiebe and Mike McIntyre report the Hellebuyck camp and Jets management aren’t commenting on the trade speculation.
Wiebe and McIntyre noted Hellebuyck’s frustration over the Jets’ disappointing performance during his end-of-season media availability and in his exit interview with Cheveldayoff, who praised his goalie’s competitiveness.
The expectation was that the Jets would attempt to address Hellebuyck’s concerns by making off-season upgrades while he remains front and center in their efforts to put this season behind them.
So far, there’s nothing official about a trade request. Wiebe and McIntyre suggest the recent buzz is an example of playing “connect the dots” after Hellebuyck’s Team USA teammates Dylan Larkin requested a trade from the Detroit Red Wings and Quinn Hughes forced his way out of Vancouver.
The recent speculation doesn’t mean a trade is imminent, but the prospect is at least worth acknowledging. If the Jets put Hellebuyck on the block, their asking price will be high.
History shows Cheveldayoff isn’t one to make a panic move when a player requests a trade. Evander Kane, Jacob Trouba, Patrik Laine, and Pierre-Luc Dubois weren’t moved until the Jets received what they considered to be suitable offers.
Wiebe and McIntyre also point out that this isn’t the first time that Hellebuyck was considered to be on his way out of Winnipeg. He and Scheifele were considered trade candidates entering the final season of their previous contracts, only to sign contract extensions.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: The only reason I can see for the Jets to trade Hellebuyck is if he wants out. Otherwise, trading him would derail their chances of regaining playoff contender status next season, let alone any chance of winning the Stanley Cup.
The Jets are built to win right now, with Hellebuyck as the centerpiece of that plan. That’s why they re-signed Kyle Connor to a lucrative long-term extension last fall. It’s why Cheveldayoff brought in Jonathan Toews and Gustav Nyquist last summer, who ultimately turned into busts and were contributing factors in the Jets missing the playoffs.
I agree with what Wiebe and McIntyre are saying about this situation. If Hellebuyck wants out, Cheveldayoff won’t rush into a deal. The Jets will also need a new starting goaltender, and no, they won’t want a castoff or a washed-up veteran. They also won’t want a package of solely draft picks and prospects.
The asking price will be high, and Cheveldayoff will wait for the right return, even if it takes until next year’s trade deadline to get it. That shouldn’t adversely affect Hellebuyck’s performance because playing at his best will maintain his high value in the trade market.
As Dreger admitted, everything is just speculation right now, and will remain so until there’s definitive word that Hellebuyck is on the trade block.
THE LATEST MAPLE LEAFS SPECULATION
TSN: Darren Dreger reports “a number of NHL executives” believe the Toronto Maple Leafs will trade winger Matthew Knies. GM John Chayka is conducting his due diligence, while other clubs are finding out why the 23-year-old power forward would be available.
Dreger also thinks Maple Leafs defenseman Morgan Rielly seems more likely to change addresses. Management isn’t pushing it, but that’s the expectation from the Rielly camp.
Teams are also calling about defenseman Jake McCabe. Meanwhile, the Maple Leafs would be interested in Darren Raddysh if the Tampa Bay Lightning blueliner hits the open market on July 1.
SPORTSNET: Nick Kypreos also reports that the buzz about Matthew Knies hasn’t gone away with the Leafs’ recent management change. He noted that everyone links Knies to the Montreal Canadiens, but other clubs are also looking into it.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: Understandably, Chayka would at least want to find out what Knies’ trade value would be, and whether the return would improve the Leafs. As with Hellebuyck, however, there’s no certainty he’ll be moved. Leafs ownership wants this club to bounce back as a playoff contender, and Knies would play an important role in those efforts.
As for Rielly, recent reports indicate he hasn’t been asked to waive his no-movement clause, and he hasn’t submitted a list of preferred destinations.
FOUR CANUCKS ON THE TRADE BLOCK
THE PROVINCE: Patrick Johnston reports the rebuilding Vancouver Canucks “are virtually shopping everyone this offseason”. That includes center Elias Pettersson and wingers Brock Boeser, Nils Hoglander, and Jake DeBrusk.
The Canucks aren’t going out of their way to trade Boeser, but Johnston said he’s believed to be available. A source claimed that management believes Hoglander needs a fresh start, but he won’t fetch much of a return.
DeBrusk has said he’s not keen to be part of a rebuild, and the Ottawa Senators are believed to be interested. As for Pettersson, Johnston cited a source claiming the Los Angeles Kings considered a move for the 27-year-old center at the trade deadline. He wonders if they might revisit their interest now that Anze Kopitar has retired.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: DeBrusk seems the most likely to be dealt. Boeser could draw some interest, but his contract (with a full no-movement clause) could be a stumbling block. Speaking of contracts, Pettersson’s $11.6 million AAV through 2031-32 makes him almost immovable unless the Canucks retain salary or take back a couple of contracts in return.
UPDATES ON BOBROVSKY AND TUCH
SPORTSNET: Nick Kypreos reports the Florida Panthers and pending UFA goalie Sergei Bobrovsky remain far apart in contract talks. It’s believed the 37-year-old Bobrovsky seeks a $42 million contract over a six or seven-year period.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: Any general manager who signs Bobrovsky to that type of deal should be fired immediately. It doesn’t matter how much the salary cap rises; paying a goalie who turns 38 in September a long-term deal worth between $6 million and $7 million annually is ridiculous.
Kypreos wondered if the Seattle Kraken would pursue Alex Tuch if the Buffalo Sabres winger goes to market on July 1. Kraken GM Jason Botterill is facing a lot of pressure to shake up their roster and add more scoring. Kypreos believes they can afford to sign the 30-year-old Tuch to a long-term deal worth over $10 million annually.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: That’s a lot to hand out to a 30-year-old power forward whose best seasons could soon be in his past.
LATEST ON MASON MCTAVISH AND SIMON NEMEC
ESPN’s Kevin Weekes tweeted Anaheim Ducks center Mason McTavish is drawing plenty of attention in the trade market. The Ducks would be seeking a “hockey trade”.
SPECTOR’S NOTE: In other words, the Ducks prefer a player-for-player swap. They could be open to a larger deal where draft picks and/or prospects are involved, but they’ll also want to get an established player (likely a good young forward) in return.
New Jersey Devils defenseman Simon Nemec continues to be a player of interest in the trade market.
Boston guys on here- what’s the deal with Andrew Peeke?
Will he be re-signed?
Do you want him re-signed?
Is he too costly for 3rd pairing?
I don’t believe bruins will resign him and I am ok going in another direction. He will be making more than his value in his next contract IMHO
Same situation as Connor Clifton a couple of years ago. Clifton conned Buffalo into given him 3.3 AAV over 3 years, almost 10 million.
Peeke, a RD at 6′ 3″ 215lbs who turned 28 in March. is regarded as very reliable on the pk and shot-blocking, logging some 20 minutes on average per game. In 77gp he had 5g 9a 14 pts.
Coming off a $2,750,000 per cap hit, as a UFA he is expected to get a 3 to 4-year deal ranging between $3 and $4.1 mil per – the amount depending upon how many teams pursue him IF he tests the UFA waters, and apparently Anaheim, San Jose and Ottawa are in that mix for sure.
Well HF30, we need somebody to play RD, so depends what he wants for $$ and term. If you get him for 5 x $4M, sign him.
He’s an NHL player, kind of that #5 guy you can move into 2nd pair when required due to injury.
Bigger guy, skates just OK, physical, tough and will play hard. Can play the PK effectively. The opposite of a guy who drives offence. Safety first when it comes to playing with the puck. Won’t have many passes picked off in the middle of the ice, because he doesn’t see that play or simply avoids it altogether.
So won’t be driving offence in any way shape or form.
Good defender down low, and in front of the net, so gets plenty of D-zone starts. Just goes off the glass and out more than you would want these days.
Brandon Carlo who doesn’t skate as well, doesn’t have the reach or anticipation defensively but more physical and will do the nasty when required. I would take Carlo over Peeke if I had the choice if you want a comparison.
Carlo was a much better d man than Peeke. Minus his time on leafs. Helm I would welcome him back to Boston if trade cost is reasonable. Pairs great with Lindholm
Agree MB4, and Carlo was just fine with the Leafs, not sure why they he gets the negative reaction from Leaf fans. He is who he is and plays his role effectively. Just like he always does.
I didn’t word the last paragraph in my post very well.
What I should have said is – Peeke is like Brandon Carlo except he doesn’t skate as well or have the defensive anticipation Carlo does.
HF30, Boston has spent to much money on their 4th line and 3rd pair D core.Need to use more younger players and veteran minimum salary players there!
Mr. Bruin 4, Toronto would never trade Carlo back to Boston after the Bruins fleeced them in their last deal!
This past season Vancouver finished dead last in the entire league and was the only team to register a sub-.400 % points pace (theirs was .354), with 216 goals scored and 316 against for an even -100 goals differential. Their record at home was 9-27-5(a 280 % pace), while away they were somewhat better at 16-22-3 (.429).
Pinpointing the basic reasons for that pathetic record, and engineering the moves to correcting them, will be a monumental task for GM Ryan Johnson and new head coach Manny Malhotra. But it could begin at the draft where they hold 10 picks, including the 3rd overall and the 24th (from Minnesota) as well as 2 more picks in Round 2, in addition to what they’d get for DeBrusk and perhaps Boeser and Pettersson.
One thing to keep in mind, of their 49 losses, 43 were by 1 goal – the most in the league, followed by 37 for Florida and 35 for Calgary.
More and more I believe a Nemec for McTavish trade makes the most sense. It addresses needs for both teams: RHD and scoring depth respectively. Both players are fairly equal in value as well, maybe NJ needs to add in something extra with a name like Cotter or some other depth player.
ANA desperately needs a RHD under 30 and NJ desperately needs scoring depth in the form of wing or center.
It must be HF30 day:
Eric Engels mentions possibly acquiring Connor Murphy.
Arpon Basu floats the idea of acquiring Zacha.
Both see keeping Montembeault for another year.
What do you all think:
Toronto sends Morgan Rielly and Matthew Knies to New Jersey in exchange for Simon Nemec, Dougie Hamilton, and a 2026 first-round pick (No. 12 overall), pending Rielly waiving his clause.
From Toronto’s perspective, Knies becomes a key piece in a deal centered around strengthening New Jersey’s young core, while Nemec and Hamilton provide the Leafs with an immediate upgrade on defence—combining long-term upside with proven NHL impact.
Well, whatever other merits there might be, Hamilton is 33 and Nemec is inconsistent so your closing observation is leaking oil.
That’s fair on Hamilton’s age, but the trade isn’t really about a long-term Hamilton piece carrying the deal — it’s about what he provides right now. Even at 33, he’s still a high-end PP driver and minutes-eater on a team trying to win immediately.
On Nemec being “inconsistent,” that’s kind of the point with a player like him — he’s still developing, but the upside is exactly why he’s valued so highly. Young right-shot defensemen who already show top-pair traits don’t become available often, even if they’re not fully polished yet.
So the “oil leaking” argument only really works if you treat both players as static assets. In reality, the deal is balancing:
immediate impact (Hamilton)
vs. high-end upside/control (Nemec)
vs. cap-controlled forward value (Knies)
That’s why picks or extra value are being discussed in the first place — not because the core idea is weak, but because development curve vs. win-now value is inherently uneven.