Hope all is well with you and you are recovered (or almost recovered) from the Shingles
I acknowledge the past (haven’t done buyouts); but this “new” world almost implores it
As you may know, I’m a businessman
Strictly from a business perspective; some investments are warranted that have current negative impacts but will more than compensate with increased production or Revs or profits down the road
The converse happens when you divest of a division that is forecasted to be a drain down the road.
A division of a large company may be treading water now; could even be losing money now; but is expected to have a huge decline in the future ; hence costing substantial more down the road. There are costs associated with the divestiture, including front laden severance costs
For just a second; set aside how much of a burden and negative impact that JJ has been on team; teammates; owners; fans…. set that aside… if we weigh keeping him at the expense of losing production/pluses now and in the future…. to me this is not a good decision
The Sid/Gino next cup window is now and for maybe two more seasons
I don’t think Jarry/DeSmith or Murray/DeSmith is strong enough to win a cup. In those cases if either Jarry or Murray go down for quite a while….Danger danger Will Rogers
JJ has to go.
Bjug to me not worth keeping… trade him
If to CBO’s were allowed (again there may be none)…. JJ and Horny (great player but Cap to production in decline)
In a perfect world …. Jimbo somehow gets Billy G hammered and gets him to sign off on Bjug + JJ + ZAR for E Staal
Pens free up $5 M in Cap; massively better at 3C; gargantuan leap in D world; at the expense of a good grit/grinder forward.
Extra Cap space now allows both Jarry and Murray
Jimbo might have to kick in an extra asset (Laffy?) or take back some of Bjugs Cap
Barring that…. must do a buyout
Even if no CBO… reg buyout of JJ; more than $2M in Cap savings this year; only costs $5.5 M cash (over 6 years !!!!!!) and most importantly the team production; player stats; player morale; ownership happiness; fan level of amusement and happiness …. ALL take aMASSIVE uptick surge
Another way to look at it …. the investment (as an owner of a storied franchise) I’m proposing is this…..only $900 K for each of the next 6 years to guarantee
All players improve statistically
All players happier
6-10 extra standings points next year
Happier fans
Improved playoff chances
Happier co-owners
The answer to the question of whether to invest should be a resounding yes
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Pens don’t buy out players. Good summation
Hi Chrisms
Hope all is well with you and you are recovered (or almost recovered) from the Shingles
I acknowledge the past (haven’t done buyouts); but this “new” world almost implores it
As you may know, I’m a businessman
Strictly from a business perspective; some investments are warranted that have current negative impacts but will more than compensate with increased production or Revs or profits down the road
The converse happens when you divest of a division that is forecasted to be a drain down the road.
A division of a large company may be treading water now; could even be losing money now; but is expected to have a huge decline in the future ; hence costing substantial more down the road. There are costs associated with the divestiture, including front laden severance costs
For just a second; set aside how much of a burden and negative impact that JJ has been on team; teammates; owners; fans…. set that aside… if we weigh keeping him at the expense of losing production/pluses now and in the future…. to me this is not a good decision
The Sid/Gino next cup window is now and for maybe two more seasons
I don’t think Jarry/DeSmith or Murray/DeSmith is strong enough to win a cup. In those cases if either Jarry or Murray go down for quite a while….Danger danger Will Rogers
JJ has to go.
Bjug to me not worth keeping… trade him
If to CBO’s were allowed (again there may be none)…. JJ and Horny (great player but Cap to production in decline)
In a perfect world …. Jimbo somehow gets Billy G hammered and gets him to sign off on Bjug + JJ + ZAR for E Staal
Pens free up $5 M in Cap; massively better at 3C; gargantuan leap in D world; at the expense of a good grit/grinder forward.
Extra Cap space now allows both Jarry and Murray
Jimbo might have to kick in an extra asset (Laffy?) or take back some of Bjugs Cap
Barring that…. must do a buyout
Even if no CBO… reg buyout of JJ; more than $2M in Cap savings this year; only costs $5.5 M cash (over 6 years !!!!!!) and most importantly the team production; player stats; player morale; ownership happiness; fan level of amusement and happiness …. ALL take aMASSIVE uptick surge
Another way to look at it …. the investment (as an owner of a storied franchise) I’m proposing is this…..only $900 K for each of the next 6 years to guarantee
All players improve statistically
All players happier
6-10 extra standings points next year
Happier fans
Improved playoff chances
Happier co-owners
The answer to the question of whether to invest should be a resounding yes
Rant over